Apple can Dominate the Next Decade of AI

Apple White Paper:

In the wake of Apple’s strategic collapse to develop internal AI and iterate Siri, I thought it pertinent to discuss how Apple can not only catch up, but dominate in ways that no one can compete. 

Chips: efficiency and vertical integration

Apple being able to develop chips in house has enormous potential to iterate on AI efficiency. Current AI hardware is not able to utilize the new CRAM innovation which researchers reported up to 1000× reduction in energy consumption for AI processing using CRAM. This implies a future where memory scaling no longer lags behind compute scaling, addressing one of the biggest structural inefficiencies in modern AI systems. If Apple pivots to offering hardware that rapidly adapts to new AI hardware methods to align with software imposed limitations, they can further leverage their compute team for profit in a high margin space and further increase efficiency leads. Having the memory located directly on-package allows faster, and more efficient ram with massive capacities possible, which allows for efficient customization of ram limitations for agentic workflows in different industries and at different price points. 

The Endgame: New Hardware, Verified Agents, Certifications

The end goal is to offer a seamless and magical AI experience, where everything just works. Apple designed hardware will run local AI agents that utilize Apple licensed software to perform industry specific professional tasks such as Legal, Financial, or Bureaucratic; anything that can be easily automated. Applying a “Red Hat” approach to software allows an alternative approach to the SaaS models prevalent that fail when privacy of the underlying data requires local hardware or being air-gapped from the internet. 

Even the option to own your own hardware has latency and other benefits for professionals. In a legal context, putting a black box in the middle of a legal workflow is a rather risky move, especially when the black box is not liable for its output, the professional is. Local AI run on models with licensed software puts the control back in the hands of the business who can optimize their own models beyond the industry normal to suit the tone of their own firm. 

Apple can strategically solve the tone and monotonous result problems with incumbent AI strategies utilizing SaaS based strategies like Harvey AI. If every law firm uses Harvey AI, and Harvey uses the same underlying GPT-4 model, then every law firm has the same "intelligence." 

A law firm’s competitive advantage is its unique intellectual property and methodology. A centralized SaaS model flattens this advantage. Apple’s strategic approach under this white paper allows firms to inject their own precedents and style guides into local models, preserving their unique competitive edge.

This approach will give Apple several lucrative B2B opportunities. Firstly, selling AI hardware based on the latest research will lead to an inevitable upgrade cycle based on Moore’s Law. As compute expands exponentially, demands always seem to increase in step; therefore, it can be inferred that as AI technology advances, professionals will have to upgrade to the latest models to stay competitive in their industries on a regular basis. This leads to predictable sales on a steady upgrade cadence aligned with industry trends. 

In addition to hardware and verified agentic programs developed by professionals to streamline industries running on general purpose AI models, Apple can sell certification for AI competency. Utilizing training videos, company exhibits, and or training seminars to various professional industries. 

These certifications would be valuable to ensure that an employee will be able to quickly utilize the software at a new company so long as it follows the same general alignment of Apple hardware and Apple verified agentic workflows. This method: locks in high margin professionals to upgrade cycles on specialty AI hardware, gives professionals absolute privacy over their data in a world without that option that is easy to roll out, gets rid of a black box workflow problem in information critical industries such as law, and further locks in businesses and employees to utilize as many aspects of your product and software line as possible to decrease downtime with churn to train new employees.

Previous
Previous

Capacity-Based Monetary Valuation of the Soviet Union (1970–1991): An Exhaustive Model of Collapse

Next
Next

Different packaging, same product